Part One of Two | Read Part Two | Print PDF

The Beckman Model G pH meter, adapted from an advertisement.

The Beckman Model G pH meter, adapted from an advertisement.1

Can We Find Ripeness in the Laboratory?

The single most important winemaking decision is when to pick. One would think that nothing would be easier than knowing when fruit is ripe. All the insects and the animals seem to know. So why should we humans find this so difficult? It is easy to see that such a momentous decision requires care and attention—and nature is telling us everything we need to know, if we can just observe.

But for some people, winemaking is alchemy. It is a way to transform the Earth into Gold, to get Wealth, Power, Love, maybe even to get Beauty, if one can own that.

We should feel very lucky. With each step in the progress of science and technology—chemistry, microbiology, genetics, aerial and satellite mapping, chemical engineering, and so forth—new discoveries and technologies are applied almost immediately to winegrowing. This is a reflection of the love that humanity gives to wine! And yet, next to this beautiful passion lies something else: the ambition to create an ever greater, more perfect wine. And this leads inevitably to the quest for the magic “Faustian” key, to unlock the magic secret, to literally “make” the world’s greatest wine.

So when it comes to having to choose that most critical moment, when to pick, it is only natural that we should want to fall back on something on which we can rely, some objective measure, something we can test.

In winemaking, it has been like this now for more than two hundred years. The first tool was the hydrometer (to test density of the must for sugar content); then it was the titration buret (to test total acidity); then the refractometer (a more precise way to test sugar levels); then the pH meter* (to get an alternative measure of acidity); then the spectrophotometer (to measure color and tannin); and more recently, the HPLC (High-pressure liquid chromatography, used to characterize the anthocyans and polyphenolics). Next up: GC-MS (Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy), which is used to characterize aromas and aroma precursors. If you don’t know what any of this means, don’t worry—it doesn’t matter. This quest will never end.

We should be able to see a pattern here: So far, each of these methods has failed to unlock the riddle—thus we are still looking for the magic key.

Here is the paradox: If you could control everything, would you really want to? And if everyone knew the same “secret,“ had the same recipe, the same “magic” formula, what would it be worth? It wouldn’t be a secret anymore, and all wines would resemble one another. I hope it is obvious to the reader that to my mind this path leads inevitably to the death of wine. Nonetheless, it’s not all bad; there is also much good. The role of science and technology in winegrowing deserves a more thoughtful discussion, which I will defer to another “Communique.”

Here is the good news: Despite the failure of science to determine ripeness, with our eyes, our nose, and our fingers we have everything we need if we will just take a walk in the vineyard. I like to ask enologists if they feel the need to test the tomatoes in their garden at home. Or if you need to perform an analytical test to determine which peach you should pick? Of course, in a commercial winery, which is after all, a business, we still do test; this is to avoid mistakes and to verify our observations. However, what we really need to know can only be found in the vineyard, the berries, and the juice. To get an idea of what we are looking for, let’s describe how ripening proceeds.

Once the berries have metamorphed from hard green vegetables into blue-purple, soft, succulent, perfumed fruit, true ripening begins. It is a process observed carefully by everyone in the vineyard: the bees, the birds, the raccoons, the coyotes, the turkeys, and all the rest of us. We can see the clusters change color, but we have to touch the fruit and taste it in order to perceive the changes taking place within.

The ripening of any fruit follows the same path. Sweetness increases, sourness falls away; the fruit softens. The perfume evolves through a spectrum of aromas from green and piquant, towards fruity and floral, then begins to fade into the “jammy” notes of cooked preserves, and dried fruit, ending in delicate balsamic notes of dried wood and leaves.

We can also see the effect of ripening in the resulting wines. The color and textural elements of wines made at different stages as the fruit ripens would seem to develop and evolve. The color becomes more intense and shifts subtly from red to purple to blue. The textural elements change too—as the tannins grow in intensity, they also shift from thin, bitter, and green-astringent toward more chalky, grippy tannins, and then deeper, richer, smoother—a more fat and silky sensation—finally fading away toward a chocolaty balance of bitterness and astringency.

This path can vary significantly depending upon the climate, the vineyard site, and the variety. In fact, each vineyard will follow its own path. In each vineyard, the aromas, the sweetness and the texture will find their own balance. This is why any attempt to make a “Bordeaux-style” or “Burgundy-style” wine, if one is not in Bordeaux or Burgundy, is inherently doomed to failure. It is simply this: the fruit ripens under a different sun, in a different atmosphere and ecology, the vine’s roots explore a different soil, and the rain falls differently.

No wonder the fruit ripens differently in each place, and thus the wine’s potential must necessarily be different. Honestly, this is good news to anyone who truly loves wine, and is not seeking to simply clone Petrus or Romanee-Conti, because if all wines tasted the same, we would be bored.

Read on for Part Two of Two
Click for a printable version of this communiqué

Text Copyright ©2012 Cain Vineyard & Winery, All Rights Reserved

1 Image 1 (top center), adapted from an advertisement.

*Image 2 (top left), pH meter, adapted from an advertisement circa 1936. Interestingly, the pH meter is one of the few analytical instruments developed specifically to assess fruit ripeness. Initially, in the 1930s, it was used to test acidity in the oranges of California. It was quickly applied to grapes, but remained a research tool up through the sixties. Only in the 1970s did the pH meter become widely used as a routine instrument in winery laboratories.

Image 3 (middle right) The Corning Model 7 pH meter, adapted from an advertisement circa 1978. This is the kind of meter that I first learned to use. The alarm clock (not part of the instrument) reminds us that work does not stop at five o’clock.

Image 4 (bottom left) Almost ready, no more than two or three weeks more until harvest: Cabernet Sauvignon ripening in the Cain Vineyard. This beautiful picture was taken by our friend, Toni Conrad, in September 2007.

Blog Contents
Cain Vineyard & Winery | September 2012

Return to top